Did NT Apostles Replace OT Prophets?

Many people who have spent time studying pneumatology (theology of the Holy Spirit) and the gifts of the Spirit will probably be aware of Wayne Grudem’s works on the said topic. Especially our reformed brothers and sisters. Grudem believes the charismata gifts of 1 Corinthians 12 still exist today. He is one of  many ‘theologically-minded’ and scholarly Christians advocating these particular gifts of the Spirit. Others are Sam Storms, John Piper, Gordon Fee, Mark Driscoll, Jack Deere, etc.

The Gift of Prophecy in the New Testament & TodayThough one can get a taster of his theological stance on the gifts of the Spirit in his Systematic Theology (pgs1016-1088), another of his writings, The Gift of Prophecy in the New Testament and Today, gives a much more in-depth treatment to the gift of prophecy, as you would expect from such a title.

Though the book can be viewed as an evangelical stalwart for study on the gift of prophecy, I believe his work fails on a few accounts, which includes the nature of apostles and prophets. In short, I think Grudem offers a faulty exegesis on Eph 2:20 and 3:5. You can see his discussions in chapter 2 of the book (pgs45-47), as well as in his Appendix 6 (pgs329-436). [As a side note, this is in the revised edition from 2000. I don’t believe earlier copies have Appendix 6.]

Before analysing some of his words, let’s quote the two New Testament passages under consideration. I shall give a little bit of context around these verses up for discussion:

19 So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, 20 built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus himself being the cornerstone, 21 in whom the whole structure, being joined together, grows into a holy temple in the Lord. 22 In him you also are being built together into a dwelling place for God by the Spirit. (Eph 2:19-22)

4 When you read this, you can perceive my insight into the mystery of Christ, 5 which was not made known to the sons of men in other generations as it has now been revealed to his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit. This mystery is that the Gentiles are fellow heirs, members of the same body, and partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel. (Eph 3:4-6)

What does Grudem teach from these Scriptures about New Testament apostles and prophets? The two bullet points below are a summary of his thoughts:

  • New Testament apostles are equal to the Old Testament prophets in their authority. Therefore, these two groups, NT apostles and OT prophets, are the authoritative recorders of Scripture.
  • Subsequently, New Testament prophets have much less authority than New Testament apostles.

In discussing the two Ephesians texts, Grudem gives four possibilities of how to understand the roles of apostles and prophets in the New Testament. Those possibilities are below, with the emphasis being his own:

  1. the apostles and the Old Testament prophets
  2. the teaching of the apostles and New Testament prophets
  3. the apostles and New Testament prophets themselves
  4. the apostle-prophets themselves (that is, the apostles who are also prophets)

His conclusion is that the best interpretation can be found in the fourth option. For Grudem, from a New Testament perspective, these two passages in Ephesians teach that apostles and prophets are mainly one joint ministry rather than two distinguishable ministries. Such helps maintain his viewpoint that New Testament apostles are the authoritative writers of the New Testament while the prophets of the Old Testament era were the authoritative writers of the Old Testament.

Grudem goes on to state:

After considering these views…it seems best to me to conclude that Ephesians 2:20 has meaning 4, that the church is “built upon the foundation of the apostles who are also prophets,” and Ephesians 3:5 should be understood to mean that the mystery of the Gentile inclusion in the church “was not made to the sons of men in other generations as it has now been revealed to his holy apostles who are also prophets by the Spirit.” (p46)

But such a view seems quite contrived to prove his own point. For starters, in every other place outside of Eph 2:20 and 3:5, apostles and prophets are actually distinguished from one another. The two main places we see this distinction are:

11 And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherds and teachers, 12 to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, 13 until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ (Eph 4:11-13)

28 And God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healing, helping, administrating, and various kinds of tongues. 29 Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? (1 Cor 12:28-29)

One other major point Grudem brings up to try and prove that apostles and prophets are one group in both Eph 2:20 and 3:5 is that, in both instances, the definite article ‘the’ is found before the word apostle, but not before prophet. Thus, Paul is referring to one joint authoritative group, mainly apostle-prophets.

Theologian, Edmund Clowney, who interestingly enough used to be Grudem’s seminary professor, answers Grudem in his own work:

The absence of the article before ‘prophets’ in Ephesians 2:20 and 3:5 indicates, then, not that prophets are identical with apostles, but that they are closely linked with them since they, too, receive and communicate revelation. (The Church, p261, italics mine)

This makes perfect sense, for we see prophets carrying a very unique and important ministry amongst the body of Christ within the New Testament. Some examples are:

  • Acts 13:1-3 – Prophets utilised in the apostolic commissioning of Paul and Barnabas together.
  • Acts 15:22-35 – Following the Jerusalem council, Judas and Silas, who were prophets, accompanied Paul and Barnabas on their trip to Antioch. We read that these two were ‘leading men among the brothers’ (vs22) and of their strengthening role they had to the church (vs32). Noting that in vs32 we are told these two are prophets, we can assume that the verse is not simply telling us they were simply doing a little encouraging. But it is highly probable the strength and encouragement came out of their prophetic ministry. Not to mention Silas’ continued role in Paul’s apostolic-ministry team.
  • 1 Cor 12:28 – Though I am not up for pyramid-like leadership structures, we still get a sense of the important role prophets had from reading this verse – first apostles, second prophets, third teachers…
  • Eph 4:11-13 – Prophets are part of a team of ministries that are given by Christ to the church to help equip and prepare them for ministry. They have quite a significant role, along with apostles, evangelists, teachers and shepherds.

I’m not negating the role of apostles, nor would I even look to negate their primary role within the New Testament. But apostles never replaced prophets in any sense. They both existed alongside each other, as we find in the testimony of the New Testament itself. Prophets were foundation layers, in conjunction with apostles (hence Eph 2:20 and 3:5). Prophets were revelatory communicators, and still are.

So we can only conclude that apostles and prophets are two distinguishable ministries, yet both working together in an all-important role within Christ’s church. To clarify, this does not mean we need to add to the biblical canon, making their words the rule of faith for all time. Still, God’s Spirit utilises these ministries in relaying revelation from God. And a secondary clarifier is that this revelation adds nothing to God’s redemptive work in Jesus Christ. However, revelatory communication remains applicable in helping the church continue to walk out the purposes of God until all things are completed in Christ.

I mean, think about it. Such continued communication would make sense, for God has always been communicating outside the bounds of what is now the canon of Scripture. A couple examples would be found in places such as 1 Sam 10:10-13 and 1 Tim 1:18-19. Both tell us of revelatory prophecy coming forth which never found a place within Scripture. Prophecy, revelation, words of knowledge and wisdom, etc, were not primarily given to make sure they were added in the canon of Scripture. They were given to inform, reveal, teach, strengthen the living people of God – remember, his people being the pillar and foundation of truth (1 Tim 3:15).

So, when God speaks today, it doesn’t mean we write 4 John or 3 Thessalonians or 1 Brussels. It simply means that, as people speak forth revelation (or what they claim as revelation), we learn to weigh it against Scripture, allow to stand within the life of the historic church, keep it before the leaders we are currently connected to, keep it before the wider body we are in relationship with, and pray for discernment. It doesn’t make it 100% full-proof. But it makes us move towards becoming mature men and women of God.

In all, though I appreciate Wayne Grudem’s desire to maintain a high view of Scripture, I do not believe we faithfully accomplish this by watering down the role of prophets and prophecy within the new covenant era in Christ. This is a needed gift, even amongst imperfect people…kind of like those imperfect saints of old that we read of in Scripture.


5 thoughts on “Did NT Apostles Replace OT Prophets?

  1. Indeed Grudem is not always a good biblical exegete, noting his awful handling of Michael Licona’s work on the text Matt. 27: 51-53! He does not even allow the possible idea of the Jewish apocalyptic? (On this Text at least)

    Btw, the NT “prophet”, noting Eph. 4: 11, is surely one who proclaims the Gospel of God, he heralds the great “kerygma” (Gospel message) of “Christ Jesus”…Risen, Ascended, HE who died once for sin, is alive forever “on the Throne of Grace & Glory” (Now the Great Mediator!) As St. Paul says, it was by “kerygma”, and not by “didache”, that it pleased God to save men! THIS is the great “prophetic” (eschatological) message of the NT!

  2. Robert –

    Yes, I agree that the prophetic is always connected to the witness & evangel of Christ. It is by the Spirit of Christ that we prophesy. Prophecy is ultimately a message from God. And our message is centred in Christ & the evangel of the kingdom of God. But, also, in detail, this does not mean one must use the exact words Christ/gospel/etc in every prophetic message spoken.

    • @Scott: Once again you miss my point (you ole postmoderner you! 😉 ), i.e. the Gospel “kerygma” – the essence of the Gospel message itself!

      Since you appear to want to try to teach Judeo-Christian epistemology, you must great the Christian Gospel right or correct! But again, postmodernity always gets in the way (Derrida, Gadamer, Dilthey, Schleiermacher, etc.) Indeed biblical hermeneutics must come into the centre! And here we must overcome the radicals, the historical school, the Continental philosophers, the list is long! And we cannot forget that old Nazi himself: Martin Heidegger!

      Btw, let me recommend C.H. Dodd’s classic book: The Apostolic Preaching and its Developments (First Edition, 1936)…I have a signed copy myself by C.H. Dodd (the year I was born, 1949…Harper & Brothers, London). This copy also has an Appendix on Eschatology and History (with a Chart in the back of the book on the Kerygma, in Acts and St. Paul). I say this only as a challenge to read it, i.e. the whole book!

      The great postmodern problem with the Holy Scripture today, is this aspect of so-called Scientific Intellectualism, we see this in people like N.T. Wright especially!

  3. I thought you might like to know. Where it is written I will send them Apostles and Prophets some the shall slay and persecute. Slay and persecute are very interesting greek studie down to the root one actually means separate from the whole. So much at the very least for allowing a 1st cor service. You have a valid point if God gave 5 Ministry gifts to the body for the equipping and maturing the saints until we all come to fullness yes they must be valid today.in hoe does God do things, lets look in scripture in greek apostle used 85 times prophet over a 100 teacher over a 100 evangelist pastor less than 5 times. So what happened well Gods still sending them but Israel was rebuked for priests bearing rule by their own means and every house out for it’s own gain so what do we see today instead of every joint supplyin a need they refuse instead of discerning the body and submitting to one another as unto the Lord many say no. The nicolation doctorine means control laity so it resembles the rebellion of korah by the levitical priesthood against moses and aaron God numbered the offices man didn’t God gave gifts to the body for the equipping and maturing of the saints we there are still saints the bible tells us Gods chosen means to accomplish things look it up by sheer usage we can see the neglect of two foundational ministries brings confusion and division.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s